How to Proof Portfolios Against Climate Change Risks

    Stockholm (NordSIP) – Marcus Svedberg, investment strategist at AP4, one of Sweden’s national pension funds, recently discussed the importance of climate scenario analysis for the pension fund. NordSIP reached out to Svedberg to obtain more details on the climate scenario analysis process at AP4 and the risks and opportunities such analysis can uncover.

    Economic Scenarios Analysis and Climate Change

    According to AP4’s investment strategist, climate scenario analysis needs to be integrated into ordinary economic analysis. “We are at the beginning of a climate change that will have a significant impact on economic development and underlying assets,” he says. These changes will not just derive from our changing environment, but also from how our societies adapt to it.

    “Our climate scenario analysis consists of three parts,” Svedberg explains to NordSIP. “We started by doing a literature analysis on climate change’s expected effect on long-term macro variables, which was complemented by a fundamental climate scenario analysis. The third step integrated the climate scenario analysis into our regular economic scenario analysis, which focuses primarily on transition risks and their impact on assets in the medium term.”

    “We are now in the process of adding a more quantitative analysis on parts of the portfolio, using the findings from the previous work,” the investment strategist adds. “We have done most of the work ourselves using open sources and data but have access to external experts and data where needed.”

    According to Svedberg, political and economic reactions to climate change will be another main driver of the changes that will take place over the coming decade. The drive will be a combination of political decisions and consumer behaviour, including carbon pricing, technological developments, and shifts in demand preferences. Those too shortsighted to strategically position themselves ahead of these changes, he argues, will not manage to stay relevant in the transition to come.

    Sectors, Value Chains, Geographies and Stranded Valuations

    Noting the fossil fuel energy sector’s fragility to these developments, the strategist echoed the business argument for its exclusion. “We believe that fossil assets and the value chains that feed into fossil energy production will be affected first,” the strategist explains. “The transition will also entail extensive value transfers in all sectors that are major energy consumers through production processes, such as transport, steel and metal production, agriculture and food, as well as construction and real estate.” The emergence of renewable energy sources, its rising reputation thanks to technological progress, lower costs, and political endorsements increase the risk that fossil fuel assets will become permanently stranded at low valuations.

    However, the risks are not exclusive to the fossil fuel energy sector. “Even if fossils assets and the value chains that serve fossil energy production may be impacted first and most, we believe the transition will cause substantial repricing in other sectors as well, such as transport, agriculture, construction and real-estate,” Svedberg told NordSIP. “It is therefore important to understand the dynamics across and within different value-chains. Climate transition is an asymmetric force and while some existing companies within a sector will lose out, others may be part of the solution. New businesses and technologies will take market share.”

    “Climate change is an asymmetric force that will impact various, but equally important, sectors differently,” Svedberg explained to AP4. “Some established companies within a sector will be adversely affected while others will be part of the solution as new companies and technologies will gain market share.”

    However, climate risks will also impact different regions in different ways. “Both physical and transition risks are asymmetric and will impact different regions differently while the resilience also varies,” says Svedberg. “But it does not necessarily mean that some regions are more or less interesting than others from an investment perspective, it rather means that the investment opportunities differ.

    Climate Proofing AP4’s Portfolio

    Consistent with this analysis, Svedberg explains that AP4’s “low carbon strategy, combined with targeted actions in priority areas, has resulted in a portfolio that has a relatively low and, over time, declining exposure to fossil assets.”

    Instead of facing the risk of stranded assets, AP4 has strategically exposed itself to sectors that will benefit from this transition. AP4 was able to take this position thanks to a thematic analysis of the different value chains that will be affected by climate change adaptation.

    “Ultimately, the conclusion is that it is important to take climate-related risks into account in all investment,” Svedberg tells NordSIP.


    Image courtesy of AP4

    Filipe Albuquerque
    Filipe Albuquerque
    Filipe is an economist with 8 years of experience in macroeconomic and financial analysis for the Economist Intelligence Unit, the UN World Institute for Development Economic Research, the Stockholm School of Economics and the School of Oriental and African Studies. Filipe holds a MSc in European Political Economy from the LSE and a MSc in Economics from the University of London, where he currently is a PhD candidate.

    Latest Posts


    partner insights

    Find out more >

    NordSIP Insights Handbook

    What else is new?

    ESG Leaders 2023