Integrating Climate Risk into Private Markets

    Jennifer Signori, Managing Director, Neuberger Berman


    Laying the groundwork for future iterations of climate-integrated Strategic Asset Allocation (“SAA”), we explore this key step in the investment journey for investment portfolios. We analyse the additional factors an investor may consider evaluating to refine their existing climate impact methodology in the public markets for private markets application, walking through our process and outlining our preliminary understanding of how private market climate costs may compare to those for public equities.

    Find out more here

    Jennifer Signori, Managing Director at Neuberger Berman

    Integrating Climate Risk into Private Markets

    In April 2021, Neuberger Berman published a paper on the “Transition to Net-Zero Investing,” which leverages the framework developed by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (“IIGCC”), one of the Founding Partner investor networks of the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative (“NZAMI”). The framework outlines a climate integrated Strategic Asset Allocation (“SAA”) as a key step in the net-zero journey for investment portfolios. In May 2022, Neuberger Berman published a paper on “Integrating Climate Risk into Strategic Asset Allocation,” which acknowledges the systemic nature of climate risks to inform a “top-down” approach to incorporating climate considerations at the asset allocation level.

    Integrating Climate Risk into Strategic Asset Allocation” details our proprietary approach to SAA that seeks to optimize on client-specific fundamental objectives such as expected returns, duration and volatility, while integrating climate-related considerations, which can be tailored to client needs. However, data limitations precluded the inclusion of private markets into our initial climate-integrated SAA analysis as the potential effect of climate change was estimated using a Climate Value-at-Risk (“Climate VaR”) metric available for public equities and fixed income.

    In this paper, we aim to lay the groundwork for future iterations of climate-integrated SAA by exploring the additional factors an investor may consider evaluating to refine their existing climate impact methodology in the public markets for private markets application. This paper walks through our process to adapt climate impact on capital market assumptions for private markets and outlines our preliminary understanding of how private market climate costs may compare to those for public equities.

    Summary of Climate Strategic Asset Allocation (“SAA”) Framework to Date

    Neuberger Berman’s estimates of climate impact on public equity expected returns are based upon Climate VaR1 which is defined as the present value of future climate cost divided by the equity market value at the company and security level. We use a proprietary methodology to convert this present value metric into an effect on return expectations at the security level. We then aggregate these security-level return reductions using the index’s security weights to create an asset class-level climate return reduction to use as an input into the SAA process.

    SAA generally aims to construct an optimal portfolio with an asset class mix that offers the highest expected return for a defined level of risk or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return along the efficient frontier. An ex post Climate VaR adjustment to an SAA optimization lowers the efficient frontier: for a given unit of volatility, estimated return is lower relative to the optimization that does not take climate-related costs (and gains) into account. That said, Climate VaR is widely dispersed across different asset classes and sectors—some investments, such as those in the energy and utilities sectors, have greater Climate VaR values and appear considerably more at risk than others, suggesting potential opportunities to enhance efficient frontiers by integrating Climate VaR ex ante into the SAA optimization process

    An SAA optimization that fully integrates Climate VaR ex ante can raise the efficient frontier relative to the optimization that receives an ex post Climate VaR adjustment to its estimated returns. Based on our analysis, including low carbon indices into the SAA optimization that fully integrates Climate VaR ex ante can reduce a portfolio’s financed carbon emissions without impairing its estimated risk-adjusted return. Investors can integrate additional climate metrics, such as carbon intensity2 or carbon footprint3 as constraints in the optimization process in an intentional manner; the variation in financed emissions between asset classes makes it possible to set those constraints within a wide range, and helps to minimize impairment of estimated risk-adjusted return.

    Exhibit 1: Efficient Frontiers: With and Without Estimated Climate Costs

    Exhibit 2: Efficient Frontiers: With and Without Climate-Adjusted Optimization

    Source: Neuberger Berman, Bloomberg, JP Morgan, MSCI. Data as of December 31, 2021. Indices used: Bloomberg Barclays Indices for U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Corporate bonds, U.S. Large-Cap Equities and Small-Cap Equities; MSCI Indices for EAFE and Emerging Markets Equities; JPM EMBI for Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt; JPM CEMBI for Emerging Markets Corporate Bonds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that estimated returns data is based on NB’s capital markets assumptions and are provided for information purposes only. There is no guarantee that estimated returns will be realized or achieved nor that an investment strategy will be successful and may be significantly different than shown here. Investors should keep in mind that the securities markets are volatile and unpredictable. There are no guarantees that historical performance of an investment, portfolio or asset class will have a direct correlation with its future performance. Net returns will be lower.

    Neuberger Berman’s Climate Commitments

    As a firm, Neuberger Berman is a supporter of the Task Force on Climate related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), a signatory to the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative (“NZAMI”), and a member of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (“IIGCC”).

    Neuberger Berman Private Equity has engaged with clients and private equity managers on climate topics. Generally, Neuberger Berman Private Equity seeks to focus engagement on initiatives that provide education or pragmatic tools for the private equity industry

    • Neuberger Berman Private Equity continues to formalize the collection of carbon footprint information. Neuberger Berman Private Equity has developed a methodology for estimating carbon footprint information for private equity investments and seeks to increase the use of actual greenhouse gas footprint metrics as they become more available.
    • In 2021, Neuberger Berman Private Equity joined the Carbon Disclosure Project’s (“CDP”) private equity technical working group to encourage greater carbon disclosure in the private equity industry, and in 2022, became a member of the Initiative Climate International (“ICI”) net-zero working group, which is a global community of private equity firms and investors seeking to understand and manage risks associated with climate change.
    • In 2021, Neuberger Berman Private Equity also promoted education through co-hosting a webinar with IIGCC to help educate private equity managers on how to implement net-zero objectives in private equity investing.
    • In 2022, Neuberger Berman Private Equity became a signatory to the ESG Data Convergence Project, an industry collaboration representing over 100 LPs and GPs4 which seeks to standardize ESG metrics and provide a mechanism for comparative reporting for the private market industry. Neuberger Berman Private Equity has begun requesting the standard set of ESG metrics, which includes carbon emissions-related data, from co-investments and primary fund investments.

    Estimating Climate Cost Considerations into Private Markets

    Public Market Proxy

    Due to data limitations related to climate impact on private market investments, we elect to estimate climate costs using a public market proxy. Similar to a physics model that starts with a base assumption and then has modifications applied to it, we begin by using climate cost estimates for public equities and then add adjustments to account for differences between public and private securities. As our base assumption for climate costs, we use estimated climate costs from the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI)5 as it offers a more comprehensive dataset compared to small and microcap equities, which may otherwise be a better proxy for private markets companies.

    Exhibit 3: Public Equity (ACWI): Allocation, Climate VaR and Return Reduction

    Source: Neuberger Berman, MSCI, Bloomberg-Barclays. As of December 31, 2021.* 2.0°C scenario.** Return reduction from the 2.7°C scenario (current policy) to the 2.0°C scenario.

    Public Equity Climate Cost Methodology6

    To estimate climate costs for public equities, we first generate a base case equity value projection based on our standard capital market assumptions7.This base case assumes that equity prices today are reflective of climate transition costs and physical risks based on current climate policy (reflecting a 2.7°C scenario). Specifically, we derive a series of annual climate costs with a time horizon based on the geography of the security and spread these climate costs over the life of the security assuming climate costs increase by 3% each year. We assume the present value of the security’s cash flows after considering the 2.7°C climate costs is equal to the current market price

    Using similar methods, we can then estimate the climate-adjusted return by subtracting the corresponding climate costs from different target scenarios; the return reduction is equal to the difference between the return reduction from the target temperature scenario and the temperature scenario under the current climate policy (2.7°C).

    As an example, for a U.S. large cap stock with the following characteristics:

    • $100 market value
    • 88% estimated return in base case8
    • Climate VaR: 20% (2.0°C scenario) and 5% (2.7°C scenario)

    We assume the current climate policy scenario (2.7°C) is priced in and is reflected in the 5.88% expected return. Under the more punitive 2.0°C scenario, costs increase by 0.81% and expected return falls to 5.07%.

    Exhibit 4: Illustrative Market Value Development (Reflects Dividend Re-Investment)

    Source: Neuberger Berman. For illustrative and discussion purposes only.

    Using our public equity climate cost methodology, we can then apply modifications to the MSCI ACWI data in an effort to approximate climate costs for private market companies. Specifically, we walk through four factors and their differences between private companies and their public counterparts: (1) sector allocation, (2) corporate leverage, (3) weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and (4) control versus non-control ownership.

    (1) Sector Allocation

    The first factor we analyzed is the sector allocation discrepancy between private market companies and their public counterparts. To estimate this effect, we compare the sector breakdown of the MSCI ACWI Index versus the sector breakdown of the past five years of buyout and venture capital deal value from Preqin.

    Exhibit 5: Sector Allocation: Public Equity vs. Private Equity

    Source: Neuberger Berman, MSCI ACWI Index, Bloomberg-Barclays, Preqin. Analytics as of December 31, 2021. *Based on available data on sector breakdown, the public equity breakdown includes a consumer non-cyclical sector and the private equity breakdown includes a business services sector. NB uses the business services sector as a component to estimate the climate impact on private markets. Climate impact on this sector is estimated based on comparable companies on the public side. The sector weights of private equity are estimated using the historical five years data from May 2017 to April 2022 for leveraged buyout private equity and venture capital from Preqin.

    As shown in the table above, we find that private equity allocations are typically more technology, consumer discretionary and healthcare oriented than public indices, and such industries tend to be comparatively less affected by climate costs. Furthermore, although private companies and public companies may be classified in the same sector, private companies may potentially have lower climate costs than their public counterparts. As an example, a company in the private markets categorized under Energy & Utilities is unlikely to be a traditional utility company as found in the public markets, and more likely to be a company providing services to utility companies that is more asset-light.

    (2) Corporate Leverage

    The second factor is the corporate leverage differential between private and public companies. Generally, the average private company is more leveraged than the average public company9. Assuming that enterprise value/EBITDA of the average private market company and the average public market company is relatively similar, the equity market value (MV)/EBITDA of the average private company is thus less than that of the average public company.

    Since Climate VaR is estimated as the ratio of the present value of future climate cost over the company equity market value, we expect the smaller equity MV/EBITDA of a private company will typically decrease the denominator climate VaR, and may ultimately result in more climate cost impact per unit of equity value.

    (3) Weighted Average Cost of Capital

    Third, we compare the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) difference between private and public companies. We can break down WACC into three components: (1) debt/equity ratio, (2) cost of equity and (3) cost of debt.

    Compared to public counterparts, a private company tends to have a higher debt/equity ratio and a higher cost of equity and debt. While higher cost of equity and debt will likely increase the WACC of a private company comparatively, a higher debt/equity ratio will typically have an opposite effect (since cost of debt is lower than cost of equity).

    Combining our estimates for the three components above, we believe that the WACC of a private company is higher than the WACC of a corresponding public company10. Given that future climate costs are discounted by WACC in the Climate VaR calculation, this higher WACC may result in a lower estimate for climate cost impact11.

    (4) Control Ownership

    Finally, private equity managers generally have control ownership of companies and accordingly have more ability to influence key strategic and operational aspects, including changes in management. Private equity-backed companies generally have experienced lower default rates compared to non-private equity-backed companies (1.4% vs. 2.2% in the past three years as of 04/2022 according to S&P LCD), partially due to the ability to support capitalization of companies, such as through add-on equity investments. The ability to work with companies in an involved manner and respond nimbly to evolving business challenges, including climate risks, may better position private equity-backed companies for the impacts of climate change compared to their public counterparts.

    Summary of Private Equity Factor Adjustments

    Due to the variability in idiosyncratic characteristics within both the private market and public markets, it can be challenging to be quantitatively prescriptive when applying the climate cost adjustments for the four identified factors. That said, when considering the impact from these four factors, we can speak to directional effects at this point, which we summarize in the table below.

    Exhibit 6: Summary of Private Equity Factor Adjustments

    While it would be prudent to analyze private companies individually to capture idiosyncratic risks related to climate impact, overall, our analysis indicates that private market companies are likely to be impacted by climate costs to a different degree than public equities. Based on our analysis, we believe that qualitatively: (1) sector differences between public and private companies may decrease the climate-related return impact for private companies, (2) the lower equity MV/EBITDA of private equity companies could increase the climate-related reduction, (3) the higher WACC of private equity companies appears to decrease the climate-related reduction, and (4) the private equity control premium may result in a positive influence to reduce climate impact. While three out of the four factors imply an overall positive effect on potential private equity return compared to public equity return, we would need to further test this hypothesis quantitatively in future iterations.


    The systemic nature of climate risk demands an expanded “top-down” approach to assessing climate risk that informs broad asset allocation decisions. These climate considerations can be reactive (such as changes to the estimated returns and volatilities due to climate and climate-policy risks) or proactive (such as making specific portfolio allocation choices to minimize those risks). Based on the data available in the public markets today, this paper has explored how private investments may be impacted by climate costs by honing in on key assumption differentials and presenting a view on directional effects.

    This discussion is intended to lay the groundwork for more granular quantitative analysis to ultimately inform an updated climate-adjusted SAA inclusive of private markets. Given that private markets can represent a meaningful portion of institutional investors’ diversified portfolios, it would be sensible to explore means to overcome inherent data hurdles posed by private markets so that investors may have a comprehensive view of their strategic asset allocation adjusted for climate considerations.

    Jennifer Signori

    Jennifer Signori is a Managing Director at Neuberger Berman, and joined the firm in 2017. Jennifer leads the development and implementation of impact investing strategies with a portfolio management focus on private equity. Jennifer also oversees environmental, social, and governance integration in private markets and multi-asset class solutions. Previously, Jennifer was a Director at Bridges Fund Management, a specialist impact investing private equity fund manager, where she played a key role in fund expansion and executing due diligence and impact management of investments. Jennifer began her career in investment banking at J.P. Morgan, where she conducted credit analysis and structured syndicated leveraged loans and bonds. Jennifer also worked in a number of investment and advisory roles focused on impact investing, including at Imprint Capital and Next Street. Jennifer received a BS of Foreign Service in International Economics from Georgetown University and an MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Jennifer is on the Principles for Responsible Investment Private Equity Advisory Committee, Wharton Private Equity Venture Capital Association Board, and Impact Management Project Advisory Board.

    For more information, please contact

    Mark Oestergaard
    Managing Director
    Neuberger Berman
    T: +44 20 3214 9014
    E: [email protected]

    For more information, please contact

    Emelie Albeck
    Vice President
    Neuberger Berman
    T: +46 85 052 7861
    E: [email protected]

    For more information, please contact

    Harry Sivarajah
    Senior Vice President
    Neuberger Berman
    T: +44 20 3214 9085
    E: [email protected]

    • Developed together with MSCI and CarbonDelta
    • Calculated by dividing GHG emissions by a relevant measure of activity. For a typical company, this is usually revenues.
    • Determined by attributing emissions of investees or loan recipients to the provider of finance.
    • As of January 2022.
    • MSCI’s flagship global equity index, which is designed to represent performance of the full opportunity set of large and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed and 24 emerging markets.
    • Assumptions are for modeling purposes only and alternative assumptions may result in significant or complete loss of capital. There can be no assurance that strategies will achieve comparable results, that targeted diversification or asset allocations will be met, that a strategy will be able to or will ultimately elect to implement the assumptive investment strategy and approach described in the model. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
    • NB intermediate capital market assumptions estimated using a building block approach.
    • NB intermediate capital market assumption as of 2022
    • By comparing the Debt/EBITDA in the past 10 years from 2012 to 2022 of public companies included in the MSCI ACWI index and private companies from the S&P global LCD dataset.
    • Assuming NB’s forward-looking capital market assumptions for public and private cost of equity, ACWI cost of debt values as of 4/30 (from Bloomberg) for public market cost of debt, and an additional spread on ACWI cost of debt for private market cost of debt.
    • The astute reader may notice here that the WACC (more specifically the equity cost of capital) in theory should also affect the denominator of the Climate VaR ratio which include equity valuations. This could increase the climate impact on private assets compared to publics. For simplicity, we assume here that the (private) equity value is based on market pricing and may be driven by factors beyond the theoretical WACC framework.

    ESG-related disclosures

    The use of ESG factors could result in selling or avoiding investments that subsequently perform well or purchasing Investments that subsequently underperform.

    As used in this document, NB Private Markets consists of the following investment strategies that are classified as ESG-Integrated by the Neuberger Berman ESG Product Committee: Private Equity Investment Portfolios and Coinvestment Platform, Private Equity Secondary Platform, Almanac, Private Credit Platform, Marquee, NB Insurance-Linked Strategies Platform, Renaissance and NBAIM Fund-of-Funds Platform. Unless explicitly noted, the ESG integration processes described in this document applies solely to the Private Equity Investment Portfolios and Co-investment Platform (“NB Private Equity”).

    This material is intended as a broad overview of the portfolio managers’ style, philosophy and process and is subject to change without notice. Many of the firm level processes described herein are subject to Neuberger Berman’s policies and procedures, including certain information barriers within Neuberger Berman that will, from time to time, limit communications between the NB Private Markets team and the public side investment and ESG teams.

    Risk consideration relating to private equity funds


    Prospective investors should be aware that an investment in any private equity fund is speculative and involves a high degree of risk that is suitable only for those investors who have the financial sophistication and expertise to evaluate the merits and risks of such investment and for which the investment does not represent a complete investment program. An investment should only be considered by persons who can afford a loss of their entire investment. This material is not intended to replace any the materials that would be provided in connection with an investor’s consideration to invest in an actual private equity fund, which would only be done pursuant to the terms of a confidential private placement memorandum and other related material. Prospective investors are urged to consult with their own tax and legal advisors about the implications of investing in a private equity strategy, including the risks and fees of such an investment.

    You should consider the risks inherent with investing in private equity funds:

    Market Conditions: Private equity strategies are based, in part, upon the premise that investments will be available for purchase by at prices considered favorable. To the extent that current market conditions change or change more quickly anticipated investment opportunities may cease to be available. There can be no assurance or guarantee that investment objectives will be achieved, that the past, targeted or estimated results be achieved or that investors will receive any return on their investments. Performance may be volatile. An investment should only be considered by persons who can afford a loss of their entire investment.

    Legal, Tax and Regulatory Risks: Legal, tax and regulatory changes (including changing enforcement priorities, changing interpretations of legal and regulatory precedents or varying applications of laws and regulations to particular facts and circumstances) could occur that may adversely affect a private equity strategy.

    Default or Excuse: If an Investor defaults on or is excused from its obligation to contribute capital to a private equity fund, other Investors may be required to make additional contributions to replace such shortfall. In addition, an Investor may experience significant economic consequences should it fail to make required capital contributions.

    Leverage: Investments in underlying portfolio companies whose capital structures may have significant leverage. These companies may be subject to restrictive financial and operating covenants. The leverage may impair these companies’ ability to finance their future operations and capital needs. The leveraged capital structure of such investments will increase the exposure of the portfolio companies to adverse economic factors such as rising interest rates, downturns in the economy or deteriorations in the condition of the portfolio company or its industry.

    Highly Competitive Market for Investment Opportunities: The activity of identifying, completing and realizing attractive investments is highly competitive, and involves a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance or guarantee that a private equity strategy will be able to locate, consummate and exit investments that satisfy rate of return objectives or realize upon their values or that it will be able to invest fully its committed capital.

    Reliance on Key Management Personnel. The success of a private equity strategy may depend, in large part, upon the skill and expertise of investment professionals that manage the strategy.

    Limited Liquidity: There is no organized secondary market for investors in most private equity funds, and none is expected to develop. There are typically also restrictions on withdrawal and transfer of interests.

    Epidemics, Pandemics, Outbreaks of Disease and Public Health Issues: Private equity funds’ operations and investments could be materially adversely affected by outbreaks of disease, epidemics and public health issues in Asia, Europe, North America, the Middle East and/or globally, such as COVID-19 (and other novel coronaviruses), Ebola, H1N1 flu, H7N9 flu, H5N1 flu, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, or other epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks of disease or public health issues. In particular, coronavirus, or COVID-19, has spread and is currently spreading rapidly around the world since its initial emergence in December 2019 and has negatively affected (and will likely continue to negatively affect or materially impact) the global economy, global equity markets and supply chains (including as a result of quarantines and other government-directed or mandated measures or actions to stop the spread of outbreaks). Although the long-term effects of coronavirus, or COVID-19 (and the actions and measures taken by governments around the world to halt the spread of such virus), cannot currently be predicted, previous occurrences of other epidemics, pandemics and outbreaks of disease, such as H5N1, H1N1 and the Spanish flu, had material adverse effects on the economies, equity markets and operations of those countries and jurisdictions in which they were most prevalent. A recurrence of an outbreak of any kind of epidemic, communicable disease, virus or major public health issue could cause a slowdown in the levels of economic activity generally (or push the world or local economies into recession), which would be reasonably likely to adversely affect the business, financial condition and operations of private equity funds. Should these or other major public health issues, including pandemics, arise or spread farther (or continue to worsen), private equity funds could be adversely affected by more stringent travel restrictions (such as mandatory quarantines and social distancing), additional limitations on fund operations and business activities and governmental actions limiting the movement of people and goods between regions and other activities or operations.

    Geopolitical Risk: Neuberger Berman’s business activities and its operations and investments could be materially adversely affected by geopolitical issues in Asia, Europe, North America, the Middle East and/or globally. In particular, the current Ukraine-Russia conflict, which  commenced in 2021, has caused, and is currently expected to continue to cause a negative impact on and significant disruptions to the economy and business activity globally (including in the countries in which certain investments may  be located), and therefore could adversely affect the performance of the investments.  The conflict between the two nations and the varying involvement of the United States and other NATO countries could preclude prediction as to their ultimate adverse impact on global economic and market conditions, and, as a result, presents material uncertainty and risk with respect to certain investments.  Developing and further governmental actions (sanctions-related, military or otherwise) may cause additional disruption and constrain or alter existing financial, legal and regulatory frameworks and systems in ways that are adverse to certain investment strategies, all of which could adversely affect investment objectives.  Additionally, to the extent that third parties, investors, or related customer bases have material operations or assets in Russia or Ukraine, they may have adverse consequences related to the ongoing conflict.

    Valuation Risk: Due to the illiquid nature of many fund investments, any approximation of their value will be based on a good-faith determination as to the fair value of those investments. There can be no assurance that these values will equal or approximate the price at which such investments may be sold or otherwise liquidated or disposed of. In particular, the impact of the recent COVID-19 pandemic is likely to lead to adverse impacts on valuations and other financial analyses for current and future periods.

    This presentation is for illustrative and discussion purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security.


    Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment.

    This document is addressed to professional clients/qualified investors only. European Economic Area (EEA)This is a marketing document and is issued by Neuberger Berman Asset Management Ireland Limited, which is regulated by the Central Bank Ireland and is registered in Ireland, at MFD Secretaries Limited, 32 Molesworth Street, Dublin 2.

    United Kingdom and outside the EEA: This document is a financial promotion and is issued by Neuberger Berman Europe Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in England and Wales, at The Zig Zag Building, 70 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6SQ. Neuberger Berman Europe Limited is also a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the US, and the Dubai branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority in the Dubai International Financial Centre. Neuberger Berman Europe Limited is an authorized financial services provider with the South African Financial Sector Conduct Authority, FSP number 45020.

    This document is presented solely for information purposes and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. We do not represent that this information, including any third-party information, is complete and it should not be relied upon as such. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of any investment, and should consult its own legal counsel and financial, actuarial, accounting, regulatory and tax advisers to evaluate any such investment. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. All information is current as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. The product described in this document may only be offered for sale or sold in jurisdictions in which or to persons to which such an offer or sale is permitted. The product can only be promoted if such promotion is made in compliance with the applicable jurisdictional rules and regulations. Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment.

    An investment in this product involves risks, with the potential for above average risk, and is only suitable for people who are in a position to take such risks. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current or future results The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back any of the amount invested. The value of investments designated in another currency may rise and fall due to exchange rate fluctuations in respect of the relevant currencies. Adverse movements in currency exchange rates can result in a decrease in return and a loss of capital. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change, investors are therefore recommended to seek independent tax advice. Investment in this strategy should not constitute a substantial proportion of an investor’s portfolio and may not be appropriate for all investors. Diversification and asset class allocation do not guarantee profit or protect against loss. No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission of Neuberger Berman.

    The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.”

    Neuberger Berman Contacts

    Latest Posts

    partner insights

    Find out more >

    NordSIP Insights Handbook

    What else is new?