More

    Central Banks Take Stock of Transition Plans

    Share post:

    Stockholm (NordSIP) – At the end of May, the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report reviewing emerging practices relating to climate transition plans and assessing the role of central banks and supervisors in relation to these plans.  The report was released alongside discussions on climate transition in the real economy at the Green Swan Conference 2023, co-organised with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the Central Bank of Chile, and the South African Reserve Bank.

    Launched at the Paris One Planet Summit on 12 December 2017, the NGFS brings together 125 central banks and supervisors, which are willing to share best practices and contribute to the development of environment and climate risk management in the financial sector, and to mobilize mainstream finance to support the transition toward a sustainable economy.

    - Partner Message -

    Transition Plans and Micro-Prudential Relevance

    The latest report took stock of three aspects: (i) it reviewed the recent development of transition plans by corporates and financial institutions transition plans; (ii) it examined the relevance and extent to which financial institutions’ transition plans relate to micro-prudential authorities’ roles and mandates, and (iii) it examined the relevance and extent to which financial institutions’ transition plans could be considered and used most effectively within their supervisory toolkit and in the overall prudential framework.

    “It is important that financial institutions develop sound and credible transition plans so that they can effectively finance the decarbonisation of the real economy. The NGFS is examining the potential roles that supervisors can play in assessing financial institutions’ transition plans and transition planning processes,” says Ravi Menon, Chair of the NGFS and Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

    Key Findings

    The NGFS has identified six key findings:

    1. While the potential of transition plans is widely recognised, there are multiple definitions of transition plans, reflecting their use for different purposes;
    2. There is merit in distinguishing transition planning (understood as a process to design a transition strategy) from a transition plan (transparency to a specific audience);
    3. Existing frameworks speak to a mix of objectives, audiences and concerns for transition plans but predominantly relate to climate-related corporate disclosures;
    4. Transition plans could be a useful source of information for micro-prudential authorities to develop a forward-looking view of whether the risks resulting from an institution’s transition strategy are commensurate with its risk management framework;
    5. There are some common elements to all transition plans which are relevant to assessing safety and soundness;
    6. The role that micro-prudential authorities play needs to be situated in the context of the actions of other financial and non-financial regulators rather than acting in isolation.

    NGFS recognises that transition plans have the potential to provide much-needed forward-looking visibility on the real economy’s pathway to a net-zero future. Financial institutions will prepare their own transition plans as well as engage entities that they finance on their respective transition plans. The forward-looking information contained in transition plans will be key to enabling the financial sector to mobilise private finance in support of the transition.

    The Way Foward

    Following the overall conclusion and key findings, the NGFS will take focus on two broad areas. It will engage with relevant international authorities and standard setters, such as the FSB, BCBS, IAIS, and IOSCO, so that they can advance their respective work on transition plans and planning in a coordinated manner. Based on the findings in this report,  another team will also follow up with additional work to advance the discussion on the relevance of transition plans to micro-prudential authorities’ mandate, supervisory toolkit, and the overall prudential framework.

    “The release of the Stocktake on financial institutions’ transition plans and their relevance to micro-prudential authorities comes at a critical time in the global financial system. This report establishes a strong understanding of the current frameworks for transition plans and highlights areas for future collaboration and cooperation. The work done by the NGFS is crucial to furthering the discussion across regulatory agencies and standard setters to ensure an orderly transition to meet the Paris climate goals,” says Tolga Yalkin, Chair of the NGFS Workstream Supervision and Assistant Superintendent – Policy, Innovation and Stakeholder Affairs at the Canadian Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI).

     

    - Partner Message -

    Nordsip Insights

    From the Author

    Related articles